Private Label Supplement Manufacturing for Nevada Brands

Dietary supplements in Nevada are regulated federally as a category of food, with national manufacturing and labelling rules that apply uniformly across every state. Structure-function claims — those that describe an effect on the structure or function of the body without making a disease claim — are permitted when accompanied by the required federal disclaimer. Advertising substantiation is reviewed separately under general truth-in-advertising rules. Common rejection patterns on US labels: (i) language that crosses from structure-function into the drug-claim line, (ii) structure-function copy that omits the required disclaimer, (iii) percent-daily-value calculations that diverge from the federal reference values, and (iv) implied weight-loss copy without substantiation. This baseline is federal and applies the same way in Nevada as in every other state; there is no separate state supplement registration. Any state-level label or notification requirement that does apply to a specific product or channel is identified and reviewed per project. DAT's artwork gate reviews every claim on the pack against the federal framework and any state-specific overlay before the brand owner signs off. Where the brand owner is preparing for a regulated retail channel, DAT supports the retailer-specific documentation pack including the Certificate of Analysis, allergen statement, manufacturing-facility registration confirmation, and country-of-origin declarations. Cert panel commonly seen on US pack: USDA Organic, Non-GMO Project Verified, Certified Vegan / Vegan Action, kosher (OU, Star-K, OK), halal (IFANCA or HFSAA), and B Corp where the brand owner has the certification. Where certification is desired the brand owner provides the certificate and DAT confirms compliance against the certifier's scheme during the documentation pack assembly. New ingredients not previously marketed in the US food supply may require a separate federal notification before launch — assessed per project. Substantiation expectations: structure-function claims must be supported by competent and reliable evidence in the brand owner's file at the time of marketing. The substantiation file is the brand owner's responsibility; DAT supplies the formulation specification and ingredient-level documentation that feeds into it. Recall infrastructure: every batch is identifiable by lot code and traceable through the manufacturing records, so any adverse-event report or voluntary recall can be executed on a defined production window.